34 TG 106

AI investigation · 88% confidence

Assessment: requires investigation

The Efficiency deviation from baseline is supported by the supplied totals: 1,283.7 L over 3,432.2 km equals 37.4 L/100 km, 10% above the 34 L/100 km baseline and approximately 117 L above baseline consumption for this distance. Tank increases generally align with the timing and scale of the six fuel transactions, while fuel declines occur mainly during travel; no parked loss was excluded or otherwise indicated. The data does not establish a cause. Plausible explanations include payload, route or traffic conditions, idling, vehicle condition, fuel-level sensor calibration, GPS-distance error, or transaction/telemetry timing differences.

Next step: Reconcile the six transactions with receipts and fuel-card records, then compare GPS distance with odometer or ECU distance and review trip payloads, routes, idling, and operating conditions. Inspect tires, engine and fuel-system condition, and schedule fuel-level sensor calibration if the elevated rate continues or ECU and tank-derived consumption disagree.